Share the good news of marriage with your friends by forwarding this newsletter to them!

Action Item: If you are in Southern California, head over to Azusa Pacific TONIGHT! (See below for details.) If you aren’t in Southern California, go here to learn more about Eggsploitation.

Talking Point: Roe v. Wade ushered in a fertility bust, a Baby Boom in reverse, that sucked the life out of the economy.

Absent Motherhood Dr. J and Todd Wilken meet on Issues, Etc. to discuss author Rahna Reiko Rizzuto's attempts to justify abandoning her family.  One wonders if she would be a guest on so many television shows if she were male instead of female. (Click the POD icon.)

Lutheran Public Radio: Dr. J is usually on live on Tuesdays from 2-2:15 p.m. Pacific Time (Click the link to listen live or find a station near you.)

March 15--Screening of the movie, Eggsploitation. Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA.

March 21-22--South Carolina Parents in Education, African American clergy training conference

April 6--Wheaton College near Chicago

April 8--Texas A&M University

April 18--UC Davis

April 19--Stanford University

Miss an issue of the newsletter? Check out the archives here.

Do you need advice on how to improve your marriage or relationship, or on how to find the right person for you? Expert Dr. J is here for you. Click here to ask your question, which may be featured anonymously in this newsletter for the benefit of all.

Read past questions and answers here.

Need help with your marriage? You can also check out Dr. J's "101 Tips for a Happier Marriage!"

• To prevent mailbox filters from deleting mailings from The Ruth Institute, add jmorse@ruthinstitute.org to your address book

My name is Erik and I work for a small company in Tennessee that runs video/audio for legal depositions. My wife and I have been married almost 6 years. We have two children and our family's goal is to see the Lord Jesus glorified in every aspect of our lives.

My father-in-law writes for the Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission and sent us a link to the Ruth Institute when he read about the contest. We were very excited about participating, because in today's culture almost no other medium speaks as loudly as film. So this was a wonderful opportunity to express our views on the importance of a servant's heart in marriage that can and should last a lifetime.

Thanks again for the opportunity to spread God's love!
-Erik Parks, La Vergne, TN (Winner of $1,000)

by Robert W. Patterson, editor of The Family in America: A Journal of Public Policy, www.familyinamerica.org.

When thousands of pro-life activists gather on the Mall today to protest Roe v. Wade, few in Congress or the media will connect the dots linking the Supreme Court's invention of a constitutional right to abortion 38 years ago to the economic crisis a generation later.

The new GOP-controlled House of Representatives will certainly salute the marchers and may even call for reversing the 1973 overreach. Yet even as Republicans focus on scaling back spending and a debt limit that has nearly doubled in six years, few seem to understand that the Court deserves greater blame than big spenders for bringing the United States to a financial breaking point.

As former Jack Kemp aide John D. Mueller quantifies in his groundbreaking new book, Redeeming Economics, the Court's construction of an unrestricted right to abortion muffled American economic performance by profoundly disrupting marriage and fertility patterns.

Mueller likens the effects of Roe on baby boomers to the impact of World War II on their parents, only in reverse. Unlike the war, whose aftermath produced a boom in family life and child-packed neighborhoods --creating, per French writer R. L. Bruckberger, a "humane economy" that made America the envy of the West -- Roe ushered in a marriage and baby bust that has sucked the life-blood out of the economy.

Census data show that the legalization of elective abortion was followed by immediate and sharp decreases in fertility rates. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) sank to a historic low of 1.74 children per woman in 1976 and has since struggled to reach replacement levels (the 2009 TFR is 2.01).

Given that birth rates were already in decline and that the Court had recently dictated that states could no longer limit contraceptive sales to married couples, 1973 was the worst of times for the justices to license abortion-on-demand nationwide.

Mueller estimates that the new abortion regime further reduced fertility "by an average of 0.6 to 0.7 children per couple" -- and that the corresponding three-decade reduction in U.S. population is "entirely" responsible for the liabilities of the Social Security system. If the TFR returned to what to the late-1960s level of 2.7 children, these deficits "would be easily surmounted," he contends.

Yet the impact of Roe transcends fertility; it also gutted America's exceptional marriage culture, which Adam Smith noted was vital to our economic prospects. As George Akerlof and Janet Yellen of the Brookings Institution quantified 15 years ago, the 1973 decision eroded the widely accepted custom whereby young men married young women they impregnated.

In the 1960s, for example, 60 percent of unmarried pregnant women gained a husband before giving birth. But by sanctioning a new "choice" for an unmarried pregnant woman, the Court also gave the unmarried father the choice to "op out" of the previously unavoidable consequences of his actions: marriage and child support. By the 1990s, only 23 percent of unmarried women who found themselves with child tied the knot before giving birth.

According to Mueller, these new "freedoms" translated into the aborting of 24 to 30 percent of baby boomers' children and a 35 percent decline between 1968 and 1976 of the "net" marriage rate, which has also yet to recover to its late-1960s level.

Indeed, the nation has experienced no net increase, since the 1970s, in the type of household demonstrated to be the engine of enduring economic growth - married parents with dependent children.

Clearly, a woman's "right to choose" is not economically neutral. Unless we find a way to undo Roe and thereby restore our marriage culture and fertility rates, any congressional road map to shore up the economy will prove -- to coin a phrase -- fruitless.

Comment on this article

Support Ruth

If this email was forwarded to you from a friend and you would like to subscribe to our newsletter, click here to subscribe.