Back to Newsletter Archive
Follow us on the web:

Share the good news of marriage with your friends by forwarding this newsletter to them!

Action Item: If you forgot last week, here's your reminder: Order copies of "77 Non-Religious Reasons to Support Man/Woman Marriage" for your friends, family, church, gym, book club, cooking club, etc!

Talking Point: Kids need their dads. 'Nuf said.

 

Warren Farrell Interview Dr. J hosts "From the Front Lines of the Culture War" on Catholic Radio of San Diego. Today she's interviewing Dr. Warren Farrell, author of several books, including Father and Child Reunion. They're discussing divorce, viewed through the lens of fatherhood, and how different parenting styles can create friction in a divorce situation. (Click the POD icon.)

BONUS PODCAST:

Non-Religious Reasons to Support Traditional Marriage  Young Americans are delaying or avoiding marriage while gay couples demand marriage as a civil right. What is at stake in this battle over traditional marriage and what can be done? Dr. J appears on "Eagle Forum Live with Phyllis Schlafly" to discuss the non-religious reasons to support marriage. You can find more of Eagle Forum Live's programming at EagleForum.org/radio. (Click the POD icon.)

Subscribe to the complete Ruth Institute podcasts with iTunes!

Dear Dr. J.

Lutheran Public Radio: Dr. J is usually on live on Tuesdays from 2-2:15 p.m. Pacific Time (Click the link to listen live or find a station near you.)

June 22--Dr. Todd Hartch, newest member of the Ruth Institute Board of Advisors, to appear on the radio show "Religion, Politics & the Culture" with Dennis O'Donovan in Southern Florida, WLVJ. 8-9:00 p.m. EDT. Listen on-line worldwide.

June 27--Hosting 1000 AM, KCEO in San Diego 6-7 p.m. PST, "From the Frontlines of the Culture Wars." Dr. J interviews Jennifer Lahl, President for the Center of Bioethics and Culture Network, on artificial reproductive technology.

July 28-31--Point Loma, CA. "It Takes a Family" Conference 2011.

August 28 & 31--"Promoting Marriage on Campus," an interview with Dr. J being aired on EWTN's show, “Faith & Culture.” Click here for air times and viewing information.

Miss an issue of the newsletter? Check out the archives here.

  • To prevent mailbox filters from deleting mailings from The Ruth Institute, add jmorse@ruthinstitute.org to your address book
June 21, 2011 Volume 6 Issue 26
Reason #8 from "77 Non-Religious Reasons to Support Man/Woman Marriage"

Each member of a same sex couple may be a fine parent. But two good mothers do not add up to a father.

Children have the best chances of growing into well-adjusted adults when they are raised by their biological mother and father; barring that, their adoptive mother and father, married to each other. The uniqueness of each gender positively influences who children become. Little boys and little girls need and deserve a father just as much as a mother.

Happy belated Father's Day to all our paternal readers!

Need more reasons? Get all 77 here!

Don't miss this week's podcasts!

Please note the podcast interview of Dr. Warren Farrell in the left sidebar of this newsletter. Particularly germane for Father's Day, this podcast discusses the Ruth Institute's Father's Day Reconciliation Proposal. Listen now, and check out the Reconciliation Proposal here.

Husband's Day

by Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D

This article was first published at NationalReview.com on June 16, 2006, but as we've just had Father's Day, let's bring it back out of the vault.

Father’s Day is a day for honoring fathers. But I would like to take a step back and honor men as husbands. In our enlightened, liberated era, we have a tendency to overlook men as husbands, since the father is so often not the husband of the mother. But without some kind of connection between the man and the woman, there is quite literally, no child. I’d like to make the case that the most important thing fathers can do for their children is to love their mother. And likewise, among the many things mothers do for their children, one of the most important is that mothers love their children’s father.

As with so many things, our family learned this from our experience with disturbed children. We encountered a gifted therapist named Nancy Thomas who taught us that attachment disordered children need a strong mother figure to whom they can attach. These children don’t really believe that anyone can take care of them, that the universe is fundamentally a hostile place, and that they must take care of themselves. If the child perceives any weakness in the mother, the child cannot entrust himself to her.

It was my husband who first went to Nancy’s workshop and came back filled with excitement. “You have to be sure of yourself. You can’t let the kids bug you. You have to stay cheerful, even when they are trying to wear you down, because they think it is funny to wear you down. And my job,” my husband said to me, “is to support you. I have to build you up in their eyes, so they will respect you. If they can’t respect you, they can’t heal.”

Truthfully, I had no idea what he was talking about. But it sounded good, so I tried being more decisive with the kids. Even more important than the impact on our kids, was the change in our marriage. My husband made every effort to back me up. He responded to any hints of disrespect from the kids. And, incidentally, he understood that I sometimes needed a break from the daily-ness of dealing with kids. He became much more willing to honor my requests for rest, especially when I made those requests without whining. Through all these things, his being a better husband made me a better mother.

I knew we were making progress, when my son’s school bus driver told me, “I hear you are the queen of Primrose Avenue.” My son had told her I was the Queen of Primrose Avenue. He had heard his father call me that.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I can overlook a lot of dirty socks on the floor for a guy who calls me “queen.” And, by the way, it really did help our kids’ development to see us show one another that kind of respect and appreciation.

The feminist movement introduced an unbelievable amount of tension into the relationships between men and women. Feminism gave us women permission to nag and criticize our husbands, which most women can do just fine without any special permission. The legacy of the feminist movement has been to turn the home, which should be the place of cooperation, into a sphere of competition between men and women. And ironically, feminism, which was supposed to be about getting beyond stereotypes, supported the most negative of stereotypes about men.

I have my own pet theory about the stereotype of men dragging their feet about getting married. The socio-biologists claim that men want to invest their seed in as many women as possible, and therefore do not want marriage. I think this is only a dim shadow of the whole truth. The whole truth must include this great fact about men: They are capable of heroic loyalty. When men finally do marry, they are capable of committing themselves to the care of their wives and children. Many men spend a lifetime working at jobs they don’t like very much, for the love of their families. When men marry, they take it very seriously. It is women who initiate most divorces. It is divorced men who commit suicide at twice the rate as married men, while divorce has little impact on the suicide propensities of women.

When women marry, we get things that we want and value. We get the opportunity to become mothers. We get a home, our nest for our little ones. What do men get? They get the right to throw themselves on a live grenade for the protection of their families. Or, as St. Paul suggested to the Ephesians, husbands get the right to be crucified.

Keep reading.

Comment on this article

Support Ruth

Ruth Institute