Back to Newsletter Archive
Follow us on the web:

Share the good news of marriage with your friends by forwarding this newsletter to them!

Campus Corner

Blurb

Jamie Gruber at Ohio's Summer of Marriage rally On the midwestern leg of NOM's Summer Marriage Tour, Ruth Institute's Executive Director, Jamie Gruber, tag-teamed with Dr. J. In Lima, Ohio, Jamie delivered a short talk on the challenges faced by students who stand up for traditional marriage. (Click the POD icon.)

Dear Dr. J.

Lutheran Public Radio: Dr. J is usually on live on Tuesdays from 2-2:15 p.m. Pacific Time (Click the link to listen live or find a station near you.)

September 22-23, Effingham, IL (St. Louis area) Family Life Center Fundraising Banquet, "By God's Design." Seating at 6:30. Dinner and program at 7:00. Dr. J--Keynote Speaker. Dinner is complimentary. RSVP (217) 342-5433

September 24-25, Boston

October 2: COLFS Dinner and Gala (Culture of Life Family Services) San Diego, CA.

October 11-13, Pinnacle Forum meeting in Phoenix

October 15-17 Catholic Women’s Conference in Grand Rapids, MI

October 21, Sacramento, CA "Same Sex Marriage: Why Not?" See flier and attendance info here.

October 28: Duke University

Miss an issue of the newsletter? You can find recent main articles by going to the Ruth blog and selecting the category, Newsletter Articles. 

Dear Dr. J.

Do you need advice on how to improve your marriage or relationship, or on how to find the right person for you? Expert Dr. J is here for you. Click here to ask your question, which may be featured anonymously in this newsletter for the benefit of all.

Read past questions and answers here.

Need help with your marriage? You can also check out Dr. J's "101 Tips for a Happier Marriage!"

Follow us on Twitter!
as we keep you up to date on marriage and offer FUN tips for life-long married love!!! (Click the icon above.)



  • To prevent mailbox filters from deleting mailings from The Ruth Institute, add jmorse@ruthinstitute.org to your address book
September 21, 2010 Volume 5 Issue 31
Check out our new magnets!

Need a handy way to hang our Ruth's Reminders on your fridge? We have the solution! The Ruth Institute magnet is perfect for holding up your quick and easy marriage debate cheat sheets via our weekly Ruth's Reminders in the newsletter. To everyone who makes a first time contribution to the Ruth Institute, we will show you our appreciation by sending you one of our brand new exclusive RI magnets for FREE. Please click here to get yours.

 

September Quiz

What percentage of women who had abortions in the year 2004 were currently married?

A. Less than 20%

B. Between 20% and 45%

C. Between 45% and 66%

D. Greater than 67%

Click here to answer. Forward the question to quiz your friends!

What's Blazing at the Blog

We have four serious heavy-hitter articles on the front page of the Ruth blog currently. They are Why Actual Fertilty is Not a Requirement for Marriage: Exhibit A and On the Other Hand, S*x is a Requirement for Marriage. As well as More about adults, less about kids and Marriage, “a difficult issue”. These four have garnered more reads and comments than all the other front page blog posts combined! There must be something to them! What's your take?

 

Red Families v. Blue Families 

by Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D.

Two academics stoke the culture wars by claiming that blue states have the correct recipe for making families.

This widely-discussed book seems to be about the differences between red states and blue states, between socially conservative and socially liberal America. In fact, it is about the differences between college educated women and everyone else. You could say this book is the “soft power” version of class warfare. The rich are deliberately making war on the poor, not to expropriate their material resources, but to establish social hegemony. They want complete social approval and legal support for a lifestyle from which they benefit and which harms others.

I was supposed to have written this review long ago. The time-consuming nature of unpacking the illogic and obfuscation in this supposedly scientific tract is not the only reasons for the delay. This book made me so angry I could barely read it.

The essence of the Cahn and Carbone’s version of class difference, which they wrongly attribute to “red states” and “blue states”, is delayed age at first marriage. Later marriage allows women to complete their education and enter into high-income, high-status jobs before beginning families. These high status women are likely to get married and stay married, which further enhances the family’s financial wealth and their children’s life-chances.

Cahn and Carbone, both academics specializing in aspects of family law, leave no doubt that they approve of this “blue state script”. If their only point were to encourage later marriage and childbearing, their book would be unobjectionable. They could join the legions of abstinence educators, religious leaders, school teachers and parents who have been trying to convey that message to the young.
What is objectionable is that their data leaves no doubt that it is not “maturity” or greater self-command that makes the later marriages of the well-educated possible. The elites rely on contraception, backed up by the unapologetic use of abortion, to establish their high-status late-marriage life-styles.

Cahn and Carbone plainly disapprove of “red state” advocates of traditional morality, who are more concerned with marriage than age per se as the prerequisite for childbearing. “Rather than ground family morality in investment in higher education and disciplined childbearing, these advocates continue to celebrate the unity of sex, marriage and reproduction. The reward in this system, particularly for those who may never reach the enhanced status that comes with dual college-educated earners, is family life itself.”

As a highly educated woman who nonetheless “celebrates the unity of sex, marriage and reproduction” I found passages like these hard to read. Carbone and Cahn are implicitly accusing us of opposing “higher education” and “disciplined childbearing”. In fact, there is nothing “disciplined” about the child-bearing of the upper classes. They are simply willing to use abortion to kill off the babies that arrive too early for the script. Contraception, not discipline, allows them to be sexually active and still postpone marriage.

And we do not oppose higher education, as they seem to imply. We simply recognize what Cahn and Carbone themselves recognize in the above quotation: not everyone has the aptitude or inclination to go to graduate school, and absolutely no public policy will change this basic fact. They know that the sexual revolution isn’t working for the lower socio-economic classes, yet their book drips with condescension and contempt for those who resist its continual march through society.

Cahn and Carbone direct their fire at advocates of abstinence education and parental notification for abortion. They do not seem to realize that the early sexualization of the young and the decline in parental authority are a large part of the problem. The combination of Supreme Court decisions and federal promotion of contraception education amounts to a complete government take-over of sexual culture. Against this and the social disorganization of the lower classes, abstinence education and parental notification are, admittedly, impotent weapons. Advocates of an organic holistic view of sex, marriage and reproduction have few weapons remaining in their armory. The federal government picked a fight with the traditional sexual culture and forced us to bring knives to their gunfight.

But Cahn and Carbone turn a blind eye to all this, maintaining that abstinence education and parental notification for abortion are to blame for the problems of the underclass. If only they had more contraception and more abortions, these unfortunate people would postpone marriage, go to law school and be just like “us”.

Let me add a few facts that they overlook. First, over half of women who come for an abortion say that they were using contraception during the month they conceived. Second, nearly half of all women who come for an abortion report that they have already had at least one previous abortion. Since they have obviously been to an abortion clinic before, someone could have told them anything they needed to know about contraception.

Keep reading.

Comment on this article

Support Ruth

If this email was forwarded to you from a friend and you would like to subscribe to our newsletter, click here to subscribe.

 

 

 

 
 
 
Ruth Institute