Welcome to the Ruth Youth Blog!

We hope that this site can create a sense of community for you! Our mission is to create an intellectual and social climate favorable to marriage! This blog will hold both serious and fun discussions that face your campus and community. Be LOUD, be BOLD! Post your opinion, articles, relevant quotes, and pose questions. LEARN! This blog will also help to increase our intellectual understanding of the social significance of marriage and chastity. Keep informed.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Catholic Bishops Letter on Marriage


The Bishops recently published a letter on marriage: its definition, what marriage means to the Church and how it calls us to live!


We encourage people of all faiths to take a look at this holistic view of the human person seen through the vocation of marriage! We all have something to learn from their in-depth anaylsis of marriage and the family!


Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Marriage More then Cohabiting

Sparked by the David Letterman sex scandal, the nation is again talking about the "rules of engagement" in love. Plenty of chatter has focused on the famous talk-show host's affairs with female co-workers and on the workplace suite (dubbed "the bunker" by insiders) that he used for trysts. There's also the blatant hypocrisy - Mr. Letterman routinely mocked people for their sexual peccadillos. Now it's his turn to look hangdog into the cameras.
My take is that Mr. Letterman is now a poster boy for an aspect of cohabiting often gets glossed over: Cohabiters are more likely to cheat than married spouses.
Marriage is built on sexual exclusivity, and spouses typically vow to forsake all others in front of witnesses (and God). But cohabiters take no such vows. They may not even promise privately to be faithful.
And while society expects married spouses to be faithful, it shrugs its shoulders about cohabiters' fidelity. Listen to what a former staff member at "Late Show With David Letterman" told People magazine this month: Mr. Letterman had an affair with an older female staff member, too, the anonymous staff member said, but it "wasn't a big deal because he wasn't married."
"We heard he had a girlfriend, but she never came around, so it just wasn't a big deal," the staff member added, referring to Regina Lasko, Mr. Letterman's longtime girlfriend, cohabiting partner, mother of his young son and wife since March.
I suppose in coming days we will hear whether Ms. Lasko agrees that it "wasn't a big deal." Mr. Letterman said she was "horribly hurt by my behavior."
Was it normal for Ms. Lasko to have expected fidelity from her longtime cohabiting partner? The answer is yes, according to the landmark 1994 National Sex Survey from the University of Chicago. ... . read the rest here>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/13/marriage-more-than-cohabiting/

Labels: ,

Thursday, August 27, 2009

RUTHYouth member writes on marriage....

Sociology of Marriage

I've been working on this post for a couple days, but I had a new inspiration for how to introduce this information last night. See, just yesterday I met someone who had that strong aversion to "the institution of marriage". You know, the person who says "I'm hell-bent against ever getting married" or "Marriage doesn't really matter since its basically the same as dating". I'm always intrigued when I meet these people because for: 1) at one point in my life I didn't see myself married either so I can relate on some level, but also because 2) I can't figure out someone would hate marriage itself and in its entirety or can't see its value/difference from dating. Maybe they didn't have the best experience with it growing up.

Maybe they saw their parents duke it out their whole life and that has made them cautious about getting into a relationship for life. But does that mean that a rational conclusion is that marriage itself is the problem? Why not blame the individuals? Or the situations that led to conflict within the marriage? But to blame marriage, that 'institution' that been around longer than any of us? It's an interesting take to me.So instead I find myself trying to understand the person and their experiences which usually lead to their feelings, because although marriage exists in virtually every known human society, it can be difficult to formulate an exact response for why its good for society and many times this is ineffective since people cling so tightly to their experiences they know to be true. Also, I do believe that for a marriage to be healthy, the people entering the marriage have to understand themselves and the point of their actions first, otherwise it can almost be a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. Fortunately we have people like Dr. Brad Wilcox compiling social science data based on many studies (summarized in Why Marriage Matters, 2nd Edition, Institute for American Values from which I get almost all this data) which concretely conclude that marriage:1) is an important social good, associated with positive outcomes for children and adults alike;2) is an important public good, associated with rage of economic health, educational, and safety benefits that help all governments serve the common good; and3) has benefits that extend to the poor and minority communities, even though it is more fragile in those communities.Before I go into the specific results, I first want to point out the common issue in social science of "selection effects" - i.e. the idea that there are pre-existing differences between people who choose to marry, cohabit, divorce, etc. As was stated in this summary,"Good social science attempts to distinguish between causal relationship and mere correlations in a variety of ways. The studies cited here are for the most part based on large, nationally representative samples that control for race, education, income, and other confounding factors....have been able to use longitudinal data to track individuals as they marry, divorce, or stay single, increasing our confidence that marriage itself matters. Where the evidence is, in our view, overwhelming that marriage causes increases in well-being, we say so. Where the causal pathways are not as well understood, we are more cautious. ...Despite its inherent limitations, good social science is a better guide to social policy than uninformed opinion or prejudice."

The 26 following conclusions are taken directly from the document Why Marriage Matters, headed by Dr. Bradford Wilcox, cited earlier. I expand on a few of the points I thought were particularly interesting based on reasons the paper. Some of these may seem like no-brainers and at parts during his presentation I definitely thought to myself, "Wow, isn't it kind of sad that someone has to do research to prove this? Shouldn't these results be obvious?" But the fact is that they are needed to define and quantify, as much as possible, the benefits/side effects of marriage in order to help the Ben Affleck types (RE: "He's just not that into you") who have an aversion to marriage, maybe from bad past experiences (maybe fear of #3?). I believe that understanding that marriage is indeed a good thing in and of itself on many levels is crucial to our generation's future well-being and happiness, regardless of how personal experiences have tainted your perceptions of it.*Also, please note that these are based on averages and statistics, so outliers are always possible/present. The author himself came from a single-parent home so I find it interesting how he removed his own bias-ness. The fact is that many people grow up in single/divorced parents homes and do not face these consequences, but you can't argue with the trends that the numbers show. Also, keep in mind that social science data is better at showing THAT something is happening rather than determining the CAUSE of why its happening.Effects on Family

1. Marriage increases the likelihood that fathers and mothers have good relationships with their children.

2. Cohabitation is not the functional equivalent of marriage. - Although it looks like marriage at a first glance, studies show that children of cohabiting couples have outcomes more similar to single parents than married ones. Also, cohabiting relationship are not surprisingly less stable (50% of children from cohabiting couples see this relationship end by age 5, compared with 15% of children from married couples). This is mostly due to selection differences since cohabiting couples generally have lower income and education, and also report relationships of lower quality, lower satisfaction, and higher conflict than married couples. Cohabitation is different than marriage in part because Americans who choose to live together are generally less committed to each other as partners than married couples (see 2 below for more references).

3. Growing up outside an intact marriage increases the likelihood that children will themselves divorce or become unwed parents. - Daughters raised outside intact marriages are approx. 3 times more likely to become young, unwed mothers than daughters raised in intact marriages. Remarriage is also shown to hurt even further, with emphasis to child well-being based on stability of the family home.

4. Marriage is a virtually universal human institution. - This isn't a conspiracy theory. Something that's been around this long is bound to be there for a reason, right?

5. Marriage, and a normative commitment to marriage, foster high-quality relationships between adults, as well as between parents and children. - A new belief that all family structures are created equal as long as there is love in the relationship is all that matters is gaining popularity recently. But by offering legal and normative support to direct a relationship, providing an expectation of sexual fidelity and lifelong commitment, and by furnishing a unique social status as "spouses" marriage typically fosters better romantic and parental relationships than do alternatives. Interestingly, just valuing the institution of marriage for its own sake, makes your marriage better. Individuals who embrace a conditional ethic to marriage are shown to be less happy in those marriages. Its like believing is living.6. Marriage has important bio-social consequences for adults and children. - I thought these were some of the most interesting findings. Marriage reduces men's testosterone levels (associated with aggression, sensation seeking, and other antisocial behaviors (selection factors may play a role - i.e. men with lower testosterone may get married, cohabiting also lowers it, but marriage definitely plays a causal role in driving down testosterone). Also, girls who grow up apart from an intact married family are significantly more likely to have early menstruation and premature sexual activity. Girls with close, engaged relationships with their fathers have menstruation at a later age than those who lose their bio father at a young age. Also, girls who live with an unrelated male have even earlier menstruation than those living with only their mother. Speculations is that development is influenced by male pheromones.Economic Effects

7. Divorce and unmarried childbearing increase poverty for both children and mothers. - Even after controlling for race. Between 1/5 and 1/3 of divorcing women end up in poverty following their divorce.

8. Married couples seem to build more wealth on average than singles or cohabiting couples. - Partnerships are generally more economically efficient. Norms that encourage healthy, productive behavior and wealth accumulations (such as buying a home) also appear to play a role. Help from grandparents is also present, while not necessarily so for cohabiting couples.

9. Marriage reduces poverty and material hardship for disadvantaged women and their children. - In one study, mothers with low academic abilities who married saw their living standards rise about 65% higher than similar single mothers with no other adult, over 50% higher than single moths with another adult, and 20% higher than mothers cohabiting.

10. Minorities benefit economically from marriage. - These economic benefits are not limited to whites. Not only materially but African Americans and Latinos who are married also enjoy significantly higher levels of household equity, compared to their peers who are not married.

11. Married men earn more money than do single men with similar education and job histories. - Marriage increases earning power of men by 24% (selection effects possible factor). Reasons not entirely clear but married men appear to have greater work commitment, more strategic approaches to job searches, healthier and more stable personal routines (including sleep, diet, and alcohol consumption). Also, one study found that married men were more likely to quit a job only after having lined up the next, which was not as true with unmarried men. Husbands also benefit from the work effort and emotional support of their wives. Interestingly enough, I looked into this to see the effect on women and generally when they get married, the woman earns less on average, mostly due to the differences caused by raising children. I will go into this topic in another post :)

12. Parental divorce (or failure to marry) appears to increase children's risk of school failure. - These kids are more likely to have lower grades, more likely to be held back, and more likely to drop out of high school. The absence of a father actually affects African American children's performance in school more than whites.

13. Parental divorce reduces the likelihood that children will graduate from college and achieve high-status jobs. - Children of divorced parents have lower occupational status and earnings and have increased rates of unemployment and economic hardship. Less likely to attend and graduate from college, even after controlling from family background and academic achievements.Effects on Physical Health and Longevity

14. Children who live with their own two married parents enjoy better physical health, on average, than do children in other family forms. - Studies show that children of married parents live longer (4 years longer) even after controlling for childhood health status and family background, as well as personality characteristics such as impulsiveness and emotional instability.

15. Parental marriage is associated with a sharply lower risk of infant mortality. - On average, having an unmarried mother is associated with an approx. 50% increased in the risk of infant mortality.

16. Marriage is associated with reduced rates of alcohol and substance abuse for both adults and teens. -Not only that but teens who parents stay married are also the least likely to experiment with tobacco or alcohol. Pathways involved that lead to this are likely increased family stress, reduced parental monitoring, and weakened attachment to parents.

17. Married people, especially married men, have longer life expectancies than do otherwise similar singles. - Marriage can increase you life expectancy by about as much as not smoking can. Where are those public service announcements?

18. Marriage is associated with better health and lower rates of injury, illness, and disability for both men and women. -Married people manage illness better, monitor each other's health, have higher incomes and wealth, and adopt healthier lifestyles that do otherwise similar singles. These health effects of marriage vary by martial quality, especially for women (not so much for men). Marriages need to be of high-quality in order to get the health benefits.

19. Marriage seems to be associated with better health among minorities and the poor.Effects on Mental Health and Emotional Well-Being

20. Children whose parents divorce have higher rates of psychological distress and mental illness. - "Divorce typically causes children considerable emotional distress and doubles the risk that they will experience psychological problems later in life." Seeing your parents break up can be nothing short of traumatic and foundation shaking, so this is understandable. Children of divorce are at a higher risk for depression. This however did not appear to be correlated to a consequence of some underlying genetic predisposition towards psychological difficulty that the parents and kids share, its situational. Twin studies to prove this. High-conflict marriages were conflict is high and sustained, children were shown to benefit from divorce, but not from "low-conflict" (2/3 of divorces in America are low conflict).

21. Divorce appears to increase significantly the risk of suicide. - Both men and women are twice as likely as their married counterparts to attempt suicide. Sad :(

22. Married mothers have lower rates of depression than do single or cohabiting mothers. - Single mothers can be depressed due to burdens of child rearing alone, whereas cohabiting mothers have less confidence that their relationship will last. [41% of single white 18-19yr old single mothers reported depressive symptoms compared to 28% of their married counterparts.] Longitudinal studies also shows that marriage boosts mental and emotional well-being for both men and women. Focus on maternal depressions here because it is a mental health issue and risk for the children.

23. Boys raised in single-parents families are more likely to engage in delinquent and criminal behavior. - Even after controlling for factors such as race, mom's education, neighborhood quality, etc, one study found that boys raised in single parents homes are twice as likely to commit a crime that leads to incarceration by their 30's.

24. Marriage appears to reduce the risk that adults will be either perpetrators or victims of crime. - Single and divorced women are 4 to 5 times more likely to be victims of violent crime than married women, are TEN TIMES more likely to be raped, and 3 times more likely to be victims of aggravated assault. Marriage also reduced male criminality.

25. Married women appear to have a lower risk of experiencing domestic violence than do cohabiting or dating women. -Does NOT mean marriage can reform men. Selection effects are big here since women are less likely to marry and more likely to divorce violent men.

26. A child who is not living with his or her own two married parents is at a great risk for child abuse. - You see this repeatedly in studies, mostly because these children have contact with people who are not their biological parents and do not have their best interests at heart. "One study shows that although boyfriends contribute less than 2% of non-parental childcare, they commit half of all reported child abuse by non-parents." Also, "young children in step-families are more than 50 times more likely to be murdered by a stepparent than by a bio parent, 40 times more likely to be sexually abused."Ok, so there is SO much more to this topic but I had to condense it and leave some stuff out since this post is getting ridiculously long. Please ask for clarification where you think I could have put more and let me know if you would like any topics expanded! Again, almost 100% of what I wrote here was not my own, but from the research by Bradford Wilcox out in University of Virginia.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Celbrity Love Done Right

It seems congratulations are in order for the eldest Jonas. Kevin Jonas, the 21-year-old member of the hugely successful sibling band Jonas Brothers, proposed to his longtime girlfriend, Danielle Deleasa of New Jersey, early Wednesday morning (July 1st).
“She said yes, yes, yes like 500 times super fast in a row,” Kevin told People magazine who broke the story.
Nick and Joe Jonas couldn’t be happier for their big bro. The two took to their Twitter page to leave a little note expressing their happiness: “Congrats big brother…..Dani welcome to the family, we can’t wait to have you join us on the road.”
“Our hearts are filled with joy today and we are happy to share with you that our son Kevin has asked Danielle for her hand in marriage,” Kevin’s parents said in a joint statement released to People. “It is such a blessing that she will be joining our family. Kevin and Danielle have not yet set a date. Family is very dear to us, and we hope we have raised Kevin to be a wonderful man and husband.”...

We applaud the Jonas brothers, who maintain there stance to stay virgins until marriage. They rock out proudly wearing their promise rings. It can be done...even if you are a celebrity!!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Marriage can wait?????


Marriage Can Wait??


OK guys, time to man up and ask her out on a date! Too many of you men are slow in looking for a bride. When I was ordained twenty years ago I had a lot of marriages. Today there are far fewer, and those that marry are much older. Perhaps maturity is a good thing PRIOR to marriage but couples are really waiting a long time these days. Now I was not born yesterday and I know that part of the reason for the delay is that couples are often fornicating and are just plain shacked up as well. True marriage is delayed as false notions of sexuality and marriage are indulged.
But there is also another phenomenon that is harder to understand. I have quite a number of young women, who are very attractive I might add, tell me that they are seldom asked out on dates, that young men don’t seem very good at taking initiative when it comes to dating and marriage. Now come on guys, be a man and get out there and ask her out! .....


Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 25, 2009

The Divorce!...

Maggie Gallagher--This weekend, as Jon and Kate made their big announcement, I attended the 50th wedding anniversary of a close family member, who had married in India. The wedding was arranged. One of the children, making the toast, asked:
"How does a marriage survive 50 years? Here is what I have learned: Meet your wife on your wedding day. Surround yourself with family and friends. Wait."
I understood what he meant. I'm asked by the young, "How do you avoid divorce?" The first and most important answer is: Don't go down to the courthouse. If neither of you does, there won't be any divorce.
Oh, they follow up, "What we really mean is 'How do we create a happy marriage?'" That's a noble goal, but really a different question....

http://townhall.com/Columnists/MaggieGallagher/2009/06/24/the_divorce_will_be_televised?page=full&comments=true

Labels: , ,

Good Married Advise

When you and your spouse first met, talking, doing things for each other or just being together was probably very romantic. How can you keep that glow going in your marriage? Do the stresses of life prevent you from taking the time for one another? Many responsibilities compete for your attention. Stresses and worries can crowd out time for your spouse and your marriage. It is possible to keep love and romance alive in your marriage. The key is friendship, according to the Utah Healthy Marriage Initiative....

READ THE SEVEN HERE

Labels: , ,

Friday, June 19, 2009

For Better or for Worse: When Marriage Vows get Created

WALL STREET JOURNAL--It's the end of spring, and that means engaged couples are putting the last touches on their summer wedding celebrations. Should the cake have three tiers or four? Do the chairs for guests need bows? And, finally, what will they say in their vows?
This wasn't always a problem, of course. Until recently, everyone just used the words provided by his or her church or synagogue. In recent years, however, more and more couples have decided to write their own vows. This departure from tradition has become so common that some couples now choose to buy the words that will bind them together for a lifetime -- online.
In the world-wide Web of wedding options, instantvows.com offers a competitive "Instant Vows Wedding Package" ($17, limited time offer). Ghostwriters Central promises vows "that capture your personal voice while encompassing the appropriate etiquette and emotion" -- with "the added advantage" of being written by professionals. You send the site a brief description and some memories of you and your beloved and it will send you the vows (for $125).

READ THE REST HERE: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124537660360130153.html

Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Sex withouth Intimacy [really interested article... a must read]

The hookup — that meeting and mating ritual that started among high school and college students — is becoming a trend among young people who have entered the workaday world. For the many who are delaying the responsibilities of marriage and child-rearing, hooking up has virtually replaced dating.....

Later the article talks about the history of Dating.




Dating itself represented a historical change. It evolved out of a courtship ritual where young women entertained gentleman callers, usually in the home, under the watchful eye of a chaperon. At the turn of the 20th century, dating caught on among the poor whose homes were not suitable for entertaining, according to Beth Bailey's history of dating, From Front Porch to Back Seat: Courtship in Twentieth-Century America.
Young couples would go out for a movie or dinner. The expectation was that dating, as with courtship, would ultimately lead to a relationship, the capstone of which was marriage. Precious few of these young women attended college.
According to experts, the main reason hooking up is so popular among young people is that in the United States and other Western countries, the age at which people marry for the first time has been steadily creeping up. As of 2005, in the United States, men married for the first time around....read the rest here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105008712&ft=1&f=1001

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Revolutionary Road Movie Review


Let us state it at once: Revolutionary Road is a bad movie, despite the awards it garnered from its Hollywood peers. The story is Hollywood’s fantasy of the Stultifying Life in the 1950’s suburbs. Unbelievable storyline, unsympathetic characters, and a socially irresponsible message: evidently these are the requirements for Hollywood awards.

View the rest of Dr. J's thought on Revolutionary Roady

Have you seen it? What was your thoughts?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Alternatives To Feminism

"...In short, I claim the right to participate in the labor market as women, not as men in skirts. Up until now, we have insisted that women change their fertility in order to accommodate the labor market. I say we should take women’s fertility as given and change the labor market to accommodate our bodies. I claim the right to get married and stay married, not the right to raise our children alone, and to spend larger and larger portions of our lives alone. Up until now, we have defined our personal goal as being completely financially independent of men. I say we should find ways to strengthen our collaboration with our husbands."

This exerpt is taken from Dr. J's address to Harvard's Feminism Conference. Read the rest here.

BE ACTIVE: Ruth Youth bloggers, post you comments, stories, questions.

Labels: ,